Page 1 of 2
					
				New 2009 TurboDiesel CJ Lancer
				Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:53 pm
				by Ozie
				Statistics:
Engine: 	1968cc 16v turbodiesel, 138bhp @ 4000rpm, 228lb ft @ 1750rpm
Transmission: 	Six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Performance: 	9.7sec 0-62mph, 129mph, 44.8mpg, 165g/km
Weight/Material: 	1450kg/steel
Size:(length/width/height in mm)? 	4570/1760/1490
Currently Being Released in Europe.

 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 7:50 pm
				by SIR-VRX
				Yes, very interesting to see if it will make it to Australia.
BTW it uses the 103kw Volkswagen 2.0 TDI (as seen in Golf, Jetta etc) for it's engine. Great engine. pulls fricken hard.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:39 am
				by Vaelehn
				9.7 second 0-60? that doesn't sound very fast to me 

 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:06 am
				by Hoggy
				Having just moved from the UK, this will go down a treat, 80% of all company cars in the UK are diesel! I used to have the VW Golf TDi and while the 0-60mph time doesn't look great (although prety much the same as the 2.0 MIVEC) the mid range torque and overtaking ability will be superb.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 7:26 pm
				by jamez707
				id imagine that the lancer would be heavier than the golf (not sure)
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:26 pm
				by Ozie
				jamez707 wrote:id imagine that the lancer would be heavier than the golf (not sure)
+1 yeah it would be for sure...
but i'd rather have the Deisel CJ!!
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:32 pm
				by SIR-VRX
				My parents have a 2.0 TDI Jetta. it weighs 1540kg. My CJ weighs 1355. Body sizes are pretty much exactly the same.
The Jetta would go close to blowing the doors off the Lancer i reckon. the torque is incredible.
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:27 pm
				by edge
				Vaelehn wrote:9.7 second 0-60? that doesn't sound very fast to me 

 
i think it's in MPH, which is 100km/h, 9.7 is alright, faster then a ES lancer, a ES lancer should do around 10sec
wondering if Australia will actually import a TDI lancer...  

 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:47 am
				by Vaelehn
				edge wrote:Vaelehn wrote:9.7 second 0-60? that doesn't sound very fast to me 

 
i think it's in MPH, which is 100km/h, 9.7 is alright, faster then a ES lancer, a ES lancer should do around 10sec
wondering if Australia will actually import a TDI lancer...  

 
Hmm I know my lancer does 0-60 faster then 10seconds. 

 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:02 am
				by edge
				yours manual? probably different weather and different location, but the Australia Mitsubishi website claim is 10sec for es lancer
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:45 am
				by Vaelehn
				yea 5speed manual. also i've found that the makers claims and what is actually possible differs generally
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:42 pm
				by Hoggy
				How quick do you think you would get to 60MPH in then? I would say the manufacturers claim is pretty acurate to true 60mph (remember car spedo's are calibrated to make the driver think you are going faster than you actually are for safety reasons)
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:50 pm
				by Vaelehn
				HOGGY wrote:(remember car spedo's are calibrated to make the driver think you are going faster than you actually are for safety reasons)
 Maybe in australia. I have never heard anything like that before in my life though... I dunno to be honest i wouldn't say its ALOT faster then 10seconds but definitely less. *shrug* Mid 8's?
 
			 
			
					
				
				Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:50 pm
				by nickbutterz
				HOGGY wrote:How quick do you think you would get to 60MPH in then? I would say the manufacturers claim is pretty acurate to true 60mph (remember car spedo's are calibrated to make the driver think you are going faster than you actually are for safety reasons)
really.. they do that?